A New Analysis of An Old Box of Bones: Debunking a Peking Man Deception

Main Article Content

Elizabeth M. DeVisser
Michael F. Roberts
Joel P. Marrant

Abstract

Anthropologists have searched fruitlessly for the Peking Man fossils for almost eighty years. Writers have made many unwarranted claims about the loss of the fossils, starting with the assumption that they were transferred from Chinese to American control just before the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941 and then brought to the United States. This line of thinking is primarily supported by a highly suspect piece of evidence that came to public attention in 1972—a photograph of a Marine footlocker with many bones, one of which appeared to be a Peking Man skull. Although experts examined the photograph, no formal analysis was performed. Nonetheless, people who have written about this subject have assumed the box of bones contains at least one of the Peking Man fossils and thus that the collection reached the U.S. After conducting a detailed inventory and analysis of the contents of the footlocker as revealed in the photograph, we propose that the photograph is a deception; all bones except the skull are modern anatomical specimens while the skull is best interpreted as a teaching cast. Thus, the photograph cannot be used as evidence that the Peking Man fossils ever came to the U.S.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Black, D. 1926. Tertiary man in Asia: the Chou Kou Tien discovery. Nature 118: 733–734.

Black, D. 1927. On a lower molar hominid tooth from the Chou Kou Tien deposit. Palaeontologia Sinica Series D 7: 1–28.

Boaz, N., Ciochon R.L., Xu Q., and Liu J. 2004. Mapping and taphonomic analysis of the Homo erectus loci at Locality 1 Zhoukoudian, China. Journal of Human Evolution 46: 519–549.

Cox, J. 1974. Whatever happened to Peking Man? Harvard Magazine, September, pp. 20–27, 46–48.

Grutzner, C. 1952. Peking Man bones may be in China if not consumed as medicine there. New York Times, Jan. 4, pp. 1, 16.

Janus, C. 1972. Advertisement in New York Times, August 4, bottom of page 1.

Janus, C. and Brashler, W. 1975. The Search for Peking Man. New York, McMillan and Co.

Jia, L. and Huang, W. (tr. Yin Zhiqi). 1990. The Story of Peking Man. Beijing, Foreign Language Press; Oxford University Press.

Mann, A. and Monge, J. 1987. Reproducing our ancestors. Expedition. 29: 2–9.

Pei, W.C. no date. Studies in Chinese Prehistory. Chapter 4, Appendix. Translated by A. Shen, edited by M.H. Fried. New York, AMNH Archives, Shapiro Collection, box 75.

Plumb, R.K. 1952. Peking Man bones borne by marine (interview with W.W. Ashurst), New York Times, Jan 5, p. 3.

Roberts, M., DeVisser, E., and Marrant J. 2021. Treacherous Evidence: Archival Documents and the Search for Peking Man. PaleoAnthropology 2021:1: 98–119.

Schwartz, J.H. and Tattersall, I. 2005. The Human Fossil Record, vol. 2. New York, Wiley-Liss Publishers.

Shen, G., Gao, X., Gao B., and Granger, D.E. 2009. Age of Zhoukoudian Homo erectus determined with 26Al/10Be burial dating. Nature 458: 198–200.

Shapiro, H. 1972. Copy of Janus’ 1972 footlocker photograph. AMNH Archives, Shapiro Collection, box 75.

Shapiro, H. 1974. Peking Man: The Discovery, Disappearance and Mystery of a Priceless Scientific Treasure. New York, Simon and Schuster.

Tattersall, I. and Sawyer, G.H. 1996. The skull of “Sinanthropus” from Zhoukoudian, China: a new reconstruction. Journal of Human Evolution 31: 211–314.

Tuttle, R.H. 1975. Paleoanthropology: Morphology and Paleoecology. The Hague, Mouton Publishers.

Weidenreich, F. 1943. The Skull of Sinanthropus pekinensis; A Comparative Study on a Primitive Hominid Skull. Palaeontologia Sinica New Series D No. 10. Whole series No. 127.